THG Formulations

Do you control your forms within your ISO 9001 quality management system? If you do, you are on the right track. One of the divisive issues with interpretation of ISO 9001 and other standards is control of forms. Various organizations treat forms differently than other QMS documents and do not control them. Per ISO 9001 element 4.2.3, “Documents required by the quality management system shall be controlled.” Let’s investigate if a form qualifies to be a “document” that “shall be controlled”.

Very often, companies use forms as lower-level documents. Frequently, we really do not have to write a “standard” instruction with the purpose, the scope and details if a simple table will do the job. Often companies receive audit non-conformities because their forms are not controlled.

Frequently, being asked about not controlled forms, my clients reply: This is “just a form”. I always wonder why a form should be treated differently than any other instruction or a document. If a form is not controlled, how would we know that we need it to begin with? If a form is not part of your ISO 9001 QMS, it cannot be referenced! If your forms are not controlled, how would anyone know that you use the latest revision? Well, exactly what is a form? A quick test will help answer this question. If we have a list of directions telling us to:

- use a two-column table

- enter your business name into the 1st column

- enter your company’s Web address into the 2nd column

Most likely, we all would call this three-line guidance an instruction. So, since this is an instruction, it shall be controlled.

Now, let’s imagine that we were given a two-column form, only being asked to complete it. The first column is titled ‘You company name’ and the second column ‘Company’s URL’. Obviously, we would enter our company name and our Website address in the table. It means that we interpreted the table as an instruction.

If we concur that the 1st three-line instruction written in English was a “real” instruction that needs to be controlled, the other, blank form, resulting in the same output, must also be an instruction! Shouldn’t this type of an instruction be controlled as well?

I think that the confusion regarding forms is based on the fact that forms serve two purposes. Blank forms are concise instructions written in tabular language. After a form is filled out, it becomes a record. Unlike instructions, records are not expected to have a part number or a revision level. Records are managed in a different manner. Let us remember this and treat our blank forms as instructions letting the documentation management process govern them. There are a couple of simple tests you may take when you are tempted to use a form that has not been assigned a part number:

- If you created a helpful form and found it had been changed, would you like to know who did it and why?

- If you changed your, let’s say, test results form, would you like personnel to use the most resent revision?

- If you were out for awhile, would you like folks to be able to find your form just by following a reference to it?

If you answered, “yes” at least once, your form is a definite candidate for revision control, and falls under the scope of your ISO 9001 2008 documentation management process.

Tuning up your ISO 9001 documentation system? Quality Works will be glad to help! Visit our quality management documentation page.